Infidelity isn’t a one-size-fits-all issue. The behavior stems from a complex intersection of factors: sometimes it’s about opportunity, sometimes it signals unmet emotional needs, sometimes it arises from deeper personal issues like insecurity or a need for validation, and sometimes—purely and simply—it’s due to poor choices without clear rationalization. This experience is profoundly painful, confusing, and often exacerbated when the unfaithful partner attempts to gaslight or deflect blame, turning the focus onto the victim’s perceived flaws. That dismissive “it’s just a friend” line, quickly followed by turning the accusation back on the victim, is sadly a universally recognized pattern.
Understanding the explanations partners commonly deploy upon being caught can help victims recognize patterns of manipulation, avoid falling into the trap of self-blame, and prepare for a healthy course of action, whether that involves reconciliation or separation.
7 Common Explanations for Unfaithful Behavior Used by Partners
The explanations used by unfaithful partners typically fall into categories designed to minimize the betrayal, deny the severity, or shift the blame entirely. New York-based relationship and etiquette expert April Masini provides insight into these common verbal defenses.
1. “I Didn’t Do It. It Wasn’t Me.” (Flat-Out Denial)
The simplest, most instinctive, and most common explanation a partner uses when confronted is flat-out denial. This strategy requires the least amount of emotional effort and is often the first line of defense.
- The Tactic: Masini tells Bustle, “Most partners engaging in infidelity immediately deny wrongdoing. It’s the easiest explanation to utter quickly.” This tactic relies on the victim lacking irrefutable evidence or simply being too emotionally overwhelmed to press the issue.
- The Impact: For victims not yet ready to face the truth, this denial can provide temporary, false relief, which often leads them to back off, effectively making denial a convenient tool for unfaithful partners who want to swiftly avoid conflict and accountability. It attempts to make the victim doubt their eyes and their evidence.
2. “You’re Out of Your Mind!” (The Gaslighting Maneuver)
When a partner escalates their defense by accusing you of being “out of your mind” for suspecting them, it can be deeply distressing. This is a classic form of gaslighting and emotional manipulation, designed to make you question your own sanity and instincts.
- The Tactic: Masini explains, “Partners who try to convince accusers they’re ‘out of their mind’ don’t just deny wrongdoing; they try to twist the truth so the accuser seems irrational or unstable.” The gaslighter attacks the victim’s perception of reality itself, effectively turning the victim into the one with the problem.
- The Impact: This tactic aims to make you doubt your instincts, second-guess your feelings, and ultimately silence yourself by fearing you’ll be perceived as “crazy” or “unstable” if you raise the issue again. It’s a profound act of emotional violence that shifts the focus from the infidelity to the victim’s mental state.
3. “We’re Just Good Friends.” (Minimizing the Emotional Intensity)
Another ubiquitous explanation used to justify excessive contact, secretive communication, or extended time spent with another person is, “We’re just good friends.” This excuse attempts to minimize the intimate or romantic nature of the relationship, placing it safely within the boundaries of platonic acceptability.
- The Tactic: Masini notes, “Partners involved in long-term outside relationships—whether they’re colleagues, spouses of friends, or neighbors—often try to downplay the affair as ‘just friends.’ They’ll insist late-night calls are innocent, and that dinners or hotel stays were purely platonic, hoping the accuser misinterprets the situation.” The severity of the transgression is systematically reduced.
- The Impact: This lie forces the victim to question their definition of appropriate boundaries within the relationship. The unfaithful partner exploits the common and healthy concept of platonic friendship to shield a romantic or physical betrayal.
4. “It Just Happened Once.” (The Confession of a “Single Lapse”)
When denial or minimization fails—typically because the evidence is overwhelming—the unfaithful partner often moves to minimize the extent of the betrayal by admitting to a single, isolated lapse.
- The Tactic: Masini explains, “Partners caught red-handed who can’t deny or downplay the affair often admit to a single lapse but lie about how often or when it happened.” This excuse is common among those who must admit to the infidelity but want to instantly contain the emotional fallout by making the breach seem contained and controllable.
- The Impact: While physical connection and emotional involvement can exist independently, the question remains: does “just a physical act” or “only once” genuinely make infidelity acceptable within the context of the specific relationship? That depends entirely on the couple’s established boundaries and the victim’s capacity to forgive. This explanation attempts to trade the lie about the nature of the affair for a lie about its frequency.
5. “It’s Over.” (The False Promise of Termination)
Partners prone to repeated infidelity sometimes promise to end their affairs or claim they already have, often as an immediate cessation of the conflict, but they frequently do not follow through on this promise.
- The Tactic: Masini says, “They may lie intentionally or genuinely intend to stop but give in to temptation again. Either way, the excuse ‘It’s over’ tends to lose credibility, especially if repeated.” This tactic uses the promise of future compliance to secure immediate forgiveness and end the scrutiny.
- The Warning: This warning about chronic infidelity is crucial: a 2017 study in the Archives of Sexual Behavior found that people who were unfaithful in their first relationship are three times more likely to be unfaithful again in a subsequent relationship. If you hear “it’s over” but doubt your partner’s sincerity, seeking professional therapy might be a necessary step to gauge the authenticity of their desire to change.
6. “It Didn’t Mean Anything.” (Separating Body from Heart)
This is another common method of separating the physical act from emotional commitment and is frequently deployed by individuals who operate with a “don’t ask, don’t tell” mindset regarding commitment.
- The Tactic: Masini notes, “Partners who adopt a ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ mindset often say, ‘It didn’t mean anything.’ They believe the physical act is less important than emotional commitment, so sharing a moment of physical closeness outside the relationship isn’t a big deal to them.” They try to rationalize that because no love was involved, no real betrayal occurred.
- The Impact: While a physical moment may indeed have been solely physical, it does not erase the deliberate deception, secrecy, and breach of trust involved in arranging and carrying out the encounter. The lie itself is often more damaging than the physical act, regardless of the emotional component.
7. “I Need Help!” (Casting Themselves as the Victim)
Finally, some unfaithful partners attempt to cast themselves as victims of circumstance or uncontrollable compulsion to gain sympathy and shift the focus away from their accountability.
- The Tactic: Masini explains, “Partners who say, ‘I need help!’ try to shift empathy toward themselves to avoid responsibility. They often compare their behavior to smokers or alcoholics who can’t quit, implying they were unfaithful because they had no choice.” This tactic is often seen in high-profile celebrity relationships where public image management is paramount.
- The Impact: Claiming a problem (like addiction or trauma) to excuse a lack of self-control can be profoundly disrespectful to those who genuinely struggle with those issues. Infidelity is often rooted in choice and poor boundaries, not necessarily a clinical compulsion. The focus is diverted from the pain caused to the victim to the perpetrator’s supposed suffering.
The Necessity of Clear Boundaries and Self-Protection
Masini correctly reminds us that “unfaithful behavior is fluid.” Some individuals consider early dating exploration or long-distance digital interactions without formal commitment to be infidelity; others do not. That’s precisely why it is crucial for a couple to establish clear, explicit boundaries and openly communicate their expectations of exclusivity.
It is paramount to remember: If your partner is unfaithful to you, it is not your fault. Though infidelity is complex and can happen for many relational, personal, or circumstantial reasons, the best defense against being victimized by these excuses is maintaining honest conversations about the relationship status, what you both expect, and what behaviors you both consider acceptable or unacceptable.
Trending Right Now:
- My Mother-in-Law Tried On My Wedding Dress and Destroyed It — So I Made Her Regret It Publicly
- He Cheated. She Laughed. I Served Them Both a Slideshow of Karma
- “I Overheard My Husband and Our Neighbor’s Daughter — So I Came Up With a Plan She Never Saw Coming”
- He Couldn’t Move, But He Knew Something Was Wrong — So He Looked Up
- I Gave a Ride to a Homeless Man — The Next Morning, Black SUVs Surrounded My Home
- I Married My Former Teacher — But Our Wedding Night Revealed a Secret I Never Saw Coming
Leave a Comment